Microservices Architecture

A microservices architecture is a technology stack in which a set of software applications designed for a limited scope, known as “microservices,” work with each other to form a bigger solution. Each microservice, as the name implies, has minimal capabilities for the sake of creating a very modularized overall architecture. Microservices architecture is analogous to a manufacturing assembly line, where each microservice is like a station in the assembly line. Just as each station is responsible for one specific task, the same holds true for microservices. Each station and microservice are “experts” in their given responsibilities, thus promoting efficiency, consistency, and quality in the workflow and the outputs. Contrast that to a manufacturing environment in which each station is responsible for building the entire product itself. This is analogous to a monolithic software application that performs all tasks within the same process.

How Do Microservices Architectures Work?

A microservices architecture is a design pattern in which each microservice is just one small piece of a bigger overall system. Each microsystem performs a specific and limited scope task that contributes to the end result. Each task could be as simple as “calculate the standard deviation of the input data set” or “count the number of words in the text.” The key behind building microservices is planning the system to identify the distinct subtask, then writing applications that address each subtask. As each microservice needs to deliver output data to the next microservice, a microservices architecture often uses a lightweight messaging system for that data handoff.

 
Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture
This diagram compares microservices architecture with monolithic architecture. Microservices are generally easier to build, to deploy, and to scale due to their smaller size and distributed nature.

A microservices architecture is advantageous over a monolithic architecture for several reasons. Microservices are easier to build (because of their smaller size), to deploy, to scale (as more microservices can be added to any step to run in parallel), to maintain, etc. Microservices are not new, as the concept has roots in older design patterns such as service-oriented architectures (SOA), modularity, and separation of concerns. But microservices represent a new way of architecting large-scale systems that could otherwise be more difficult to manage in a traditional monolithic architecture.

In general, there are no specific requirements around building a microservices architecture, which gives application developers a lot of flexibility in terms of programming language, technology environment, and deployment options. Specific requirements often drive the choice of technology, and when high performance and low latency are required, an in-memory processing engine is typically used. Engines like Hazelcast Jet leverages the power of in-memory processing to build and run extremely fast microservices in environments that need to react quickly to huge volumes of data.

Difference Between Microservices and Monolithic Architectures

The key difference between a monolithic and a microservices architecture is that a monolithic program is a single, unified unit, while a microservices architecture is a group of smaller, independently deployable services.

Each service in a microservices architecture design is in charge of a certain element or function. Since only the service that needs to be changed needs to be changed, this makes it easier to change or update individual services. Microservices are also easy to scale because each service can grow or shrink on its own without affecting the other services.

In a monolithic program, all of the code, data, and settings are closely linked. This makes it hard to change or update the app because any changes have to be made to all of its parts. Also, it can be hard to grow monolithic apps because any changes to the app have to be made to all of its instances.

Microservices Architecture Example Use Cases

Many use cases are applicable for a microservices architecture, especially those that involve an extensive data pipeline. For example, a microservices-based system would be ideal for a reporting system on a company’s retail store sales. Each step in the data preparation process would be handled by a microservice: data collection, cleansing, normalization, enrichment, aggregation, reporting, etc. The microservices workflow naturally creates a trackable lineage so if any problems are encountered in the data, it is relatively easy to trace back which microservice might need to be updated.

Another use case entails machine learning (ML). A microservices-based ML environment collects, aggregates, and analyzes a data flow so that the ML framework can determine an outcome. In such an environment, the data runs through a workflow that has many steps, and each step is handled by a microservice. One advantage of using a microservices architecture for machine learning is that multiple machine learning frameworks can be included in the workflow so that multiple models can be created on the same data flow. This is useful when the machine learning frameworks are targeting a predicted outcome, and having multiple frameworks running simultaneously provides a comparison around which model is providing the best results.