Open Source Projects:
Pricing
Chat
Contact
Back to top

Pivotal GemFire, Apache Geode vs Hazelcast IMDG

Benchmark

This performance benchmark provides a point by point comparison of Hazelcast vs Pivotal GemFire/Apache Geode across the following dimensions:

  • Licensing
  • Architecture
  • Scale
  • Persistence
  • Use Cases
  • Distributed Collections, Currency, Compute and Messaging
  • Clients
  • WAN
  • Search
  • Cache
  • Transactions
  • Enterprise Management
  • Security
  • Grid Features

Comparison

Testing framework: RadarGun 2.1.0.Final

Environment: Hazelcast® Lab, 1 Gigabit network, Java 1.7.0_85

Parameters

Parameters Value
Topology 4 nodes in embedded mode
Hazelcast backup count 1
Pivotal GemFire redundant copies 1
Test duration 10 minutes
Slave heap size 4 GB
Total threads 10

Results Summary

Hazelcast is up to 35% faster than Pivotal GemFire/Apache Geode on both Get and Put operations, with lower latency.

Apache Geode / Pivotal GemFire vs Hazelcast Put operations performance benchmark.
The graphs above shows response times and throughput for Apache Geode / Pivotal GemFire vs Hazelcast for Put operations.

 

Apache Geode / Pivotal GemFire vs Hazelcast Get operations performance benchmark.
The graphs above shows response times and throughput for Apache Geode / Pivotal GemFire vs Hazelcast for Get operations.
Loading